Relación entre la autoeficacia para dejar de fumar, la voluntad propia y quién envía a los pacientes / Relationship between self-efficacy to quit smoking, own will and who referred patients

Objetivo: Comprobar si el grado de autoeficacia (AE) para dejar de fumar es diferente según quién remita al fumador a la consulta de tabaquismo y evaluar si el grado de AE medida según procedencia tiene impacto en el resultado (éxito o fracaso). Método: Estudio observacional, longitudinal (cohorte prospectiva), multicéntrico, en consultas para dejar de fumar de España y Argentina. Para valorar la motivación, fueron utilizados test cuantitativos (Richmond, Henry Mondor de Paris y Khimji Watts) y una escala semicuantitativa. La AE se midió con una pregunta de dos cuestionarios distintos (pregunta 4 del cuestionario de Richmond y pregunta 3 del cuestionario de Khimji-Watts). El análisis estadístico incluyó modelos descriptivos, de asociación y de regresión. Resultados: Muestra de 182 sujetos (90 [49,5%] mujeres, edad media 51,4 años [DE: 11; IC 26-77]). Con la pregunta 3 de AE del test Khimji-Watts se encontró asociación con la procedencia en los varones: acudir por voluntad propia incrementa la AE frente a los que acuden enviados desde atención primaria o desde otras especialidades. Ninguna de las variables de AE presentó asociación con el resultado en dejar de fumar, pero las mujeres que acudieron por voluntad propia o enviadas desde atención primaria tienen más probabilidades de dejar de fumar. Los varones procedentes de otras especialidades y con edades medias tienen más probabilidades de fracaso. Conclusiones: Los varones que acuden a dejar de fumar por voluntad propia presentan puntuaciones más altas de AE que aquellos que acuden enviados por atención primaria y otras especialidades. No hemos encontrado una mayor abstinencia final según la puntuación de AE y la procedencia.(AU)

Objective: To check whether the degree of self-efficacy to quit smoking is different depending on who refers the smoker to the smoking cessation clinics, considering as origin: primary care, from another medical specialist or by the patient’s own volition, and to assess whether the degree of self-efficacy measured by who refers the patient has an impact on the ­outcome (success or failure). Methods: Observational, longitudinal (prospective cohort), multicentre study in smoking cessation clinics in Spain and Argentina (daily clinical practice). Quantitative tests (Richmond, Henry Mondor de Paris and Khimji Watts) and one semiquantitative test were used to assess motivation. Self-efficacy was measured with one question from two different questionnaires (question 4 of the Richmond questionnaire and question 3 of the Khimji-Watts questionnaire). Statistical analysis included descriptive, association, and regression models. Results: 182 subjects [90 (49.5%) women, mean age 51.4 years (11; 25-77)]. With question three of the auto-efficacy of the Khimji-Watts test an association was found with the origin in men: attending of their own free will increases self-efficacy compared to those who attend sent from primary care or from other specialties. None of the self-efficacy variables was associated with the outcome of quitting smoking, but women who attended of their own free will or referred from primary care are more likely to quit smoking. Men from other specialties and with middle ages are more likely to fail. Conclusions: Men referred for QS by his OV have higher SE scores (KWT3 question) than those referred by PC and OS. We did not find a higher final abstinence according to SE score and source.(AU)

Is the motivation to quit smoking a predictor of abstinence maintenance?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the utility of measuring motivation to quit smoking as a predictor of abstinence maintenance among smokers who wanted to quit and who were included in a multicenter study conducted in daily clinical practice. METHODS: This observational, longitudinal (prospective cohort), multicenter study was conducted in smoking clinics in Spain and the Argentine Republic in daily clinical practice. Motivation was assessed using three quantitative motivation tests and a Visual Analogue Scale. Statistical analysis included descriptive, association measures and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of a total of 404 subjects, 273 were ultimately included for analysis (147 women; 53.8%), mean age 51±11 years). In one year, 53.5% (36.13% by intention to treat) of subjects (146) were successful in quitting smoking [men: 45.2% (66) and women: 54.8% (80)], with no differences between sexes. None of the scales utilized was associated, in an unquestionable or direct way, with long-term abstinence, although three of them, in a very complex model, with additional variables and added interactions, were associated with the 'result' variable, when other variables intervened in certain circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: None of the analyzed motivational scales alone demonstrated an association with success or failure in quitting smoking; thus, their use in isolation is of no value. Some of the scales analyzed might be related to the maintenance of abstinence but in complex models where other variables intervene, which makes interpretation considerably difficult. Therefore, the predictive capacity of the tests analyzed, based on the models, was low.

¿Cómo son los fumadores del EPOC. AR? Características de tabaquismo en población con y sin EPOC / How are COPD. AR smokers? Smoking Characteristics of Populations With and Without COPD

Introducción: Entre 2014 y 2016, se realizó en Argentina el estudio EPOC.AR, a fin de determinar la prevalencia de EPOC en el país. El presente trabajo se realizó para comparar las características de tabaquismo en fumadores con y sin EPOC de dicho estudio, conocer cuántos recibieron Consejo Médico, las características de sus intentos previos de abandono y la exposición a humo de tabaco de segunda mano. Material y Métodos: La asociación entre tabaquismo y sus características y EPOC se evaluó por Odds Ratio, su intervalo de confianza del 95% y valor p correspondiente al test de hipótesis, utilizando la técnica de chi cuadrado. Resultados: Se incluyeron 3469 encuestas en mayores de 39 años, 42.2% hombres. Fueron fumadores actuales o anteriores 70.7% y el 53.3% de ellos tenía características espirométricas de EPOC. El 34.7% es fumador actual, de los que 73,4% piensa en dejar de fumar, 64% recibió consejo y sólo 7.3% refiere haber utilizado algún tratamiento. El 40.2% de los encuestados refirió exposición a humo ambiental y el 56.1% refirió exposición laboral a humo de tabaco: Entre los fumadores del EPOC.AR, la mayoría fuman menos de 20 cigarrillos por día, hay mayor prevalencia de EPOC en hombres y mayor porcentaje de nunca fumadores con EPOC en mujeres. Alto porcentaje piensa dejar de fumar, algo menor en los que tienen EPOC, que tuvieron más intentos previos de dejar. Casi la mitad no recibió consejo médico y muy bajo porcentaje utilizó fármacos para dejar. Existe alta exposición a humo de segunda mano en casas y trabajo. Conclusiones: los fumadores del EPOC.AR fuman menos de 20 cigarrillos/día, hay más hombres, una alto porcentaje quiere dejar y muy pocos reciben consejo médico o fármacos.

How are COPD. AR smokers? Smoking Characteristics of Populations With and Without COPD / ¿Cómo son los fumadores del EPOC. AR? Características de tabaquismo en población con y sin EPOC

Introduction: The COPD.AR Study was conducted between 2014 and 2016 in Argentina to determine the prevalence of COPD in the country. This work was carried out to compare the smoking characteristics of smokers with and without COPD of said study, to know how many of them received medical advice, the characteristics of their previous attempts to quit and their exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke. Materials and Methods: The association between smoking characteristics and COPD was evaluated by Odds Ratio, its 95% confidence interval and p value corresponding to the hypothesis test, using the chi square technique. Results: We included 3469 surveys of subjects older than 39 years, 42.2% men. 70.7% were current or former smokers and 53.3% had spirometric characteristics of COPD. 34.7% are current smokers, 73.4% out of which think about quitting; 64% received advice about it and only 7.3% reported having used some treatment. 40.2% of the respondents reported exposure to environmental smoke, and 56.1% reported occupational exposure to tobacco smoke. The majority of COPD.AR smokers smoke less than 20 cigarettes per day; there is a higher prevalence of COPD in men and a higher percentage of never smokers with COPD in women. A high percentage thinks of quitting smoking, a little lower among patients with COPD, who had more previous attempts to quit. Almost half of the subjects did not receive any medical advice and a very low percentage used drugs to quit. There is high exposure to secondhand smoke in homes and workplaces. Conclusions: COPD.AR smokers smoke less than 20 cigarettes a day; there are more men, a high percentage want to quit and very few receive medical advice or drugs.

Documento de consenso sobre la docencia del tabaquismo en las facultades de Medicina / Consensus Document on Medical Faculty Education on the Treatment of Smoking

Se presentan los resultados del consenso alcanzado por diferentes expertos en representación de sociedades médicas respiratorias de la Comunidad Latinoamericana y de la Península Ibérica sobre cuáles deben ser los objetivos docentes y competencias asociadas (conocimientos y habilidades), así como los contenidos concretos y la necesaria dedicación horaria que las escuelas de Medicina de dicho ámbito geográfico deberían tener sobre el abaquismo. El documento desarrolla los siguientes aspectos, que cubren todo el espectro del área de conocimiento sobre tabaquismo: epidemiología, bases neurofisiológicas de la dependencia a la nicotina, factores asociados con el inicio y mantenimiento de dicho consumo, enfermedades asociadas con el tabaquismo, diagnóstico, intervención mínima, medidas terapéuticas no farmacológicas, tratamiento farmacológico y prevención

We report the results of a consensus reached by an expert group of representatives from different medical societies in Latin America on the objectives, competencies (knowledge, and skills), content, and duration of smoking cessation education in Latin American medical schools. The document discusses the following aspects: epidemiology, nicotine dependence, factors for initiation and maintenance of tobacco use, smoking-related disorders, diagnosis, minimal intervention, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation, and prevention of smoking

Preguntas y respuestas relacionadas con tabaquismo en pacientes con EPID. Aplicación de metodología con formato PICO / Questions and Answers on Smoking in Patients With Diffuse ILD. Use of PICO Methodology

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los grupos de Tabaquismo y de Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales Difusas (EPID) de ALAT y SEPAR han colaborado para la realización de este documento. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: En el mismo se da respuesta, siguiendo metodología PICO, a diferentes interrogantes sobre la relación entre el consumo de tabaco y las EPID. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Sus principales recomendaciones son: a) evidencia moderada y recomendación fuerte para considerar el tabaquismo como un factor de riesgo para el desarrollo y/o modificador de la progresión de EPID; b) evidencia moderada para identificar que existe un incremento de la mortalidad en la EPID independientemente de su patrón histológico. Evidencia baja para adjudicarlo al tabaquismo y recomendación fuerte para identificar a los pacientes con EPID precozmente. Se hacen necesarios nuevos estudios que evalúen el efecto de la cesación tabáquica en los pacientes con EPID; c) evidencia baja y recomendación débil para definir el impacto del tabaquismo de segunda mano en la EPID; d) evidencia baja para demostrar que la cesación tabáquica mejora los resultados de los pacientes diagnosticados de EPID y recomendación fuerte para aconsejar la cesación tabáquica en casos de EPID en fumadores, y e) evidencia baja que demuestre la utilidad clínica o epidemiológica de la búsqueda activa de los casos de EPID en los programas de cesación tabáquica y recomendación fuerte para justificar la realización de espirometría durante esta búsqueda independientemente del estatus actual de tabaquismo pero con la dosis acumulada previamente, aun en casos asintomáticos

INTRODUCTION: The Smoking and the Diffuse Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) groups of ALAT and SEPAR collaborated in the preparation of this document. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This document uses PICO methodology to answer various questions on the relationship between tobacco use and diffuse ILD. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The main recommendations are: a) moderate level of evidence and strong recommendation to consider smoking as a risk factor for the development and/or modification of the progression of diffuse ILD; b) moderate level of evidence to identify an increase in mortality in diffuse ILD, irrespective of histologic pattern. Low evidence for ascribing it to smoking and strong recommendation for the early identification of patients with diffuse ILD. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of smoking cessation in patients with diffuse ILD; c) low level of evidence and weak recommendation for defining the impact of passive smoking in diffuse ILD; d) low level of evidence to demonstrate that smoking cessation improves the outcomes of patients diagnosed with diffuse ILD and strong recommendation to advise smoking cessation in smokers with diffuse ILD, and e) low level of evidence to support the clinical or epidemiological usefulness of active case finding for diffuse ILD in smoking cessation programs, and strong recommendation justifying the performance of spirometry in active case finding, based not on current smoking status, but on previous accumulated consumption, even in asymptomatic cases

Consensus Document on Medical Faculty Education on the Treatment of Smoking. / Documento de consenso sobre la docencia del tabaquismo en las facultades de Medicina.

We report the results of a consensus reached by an expert group of representatives from different medical societies in Latin America on the objectives, competencies (knowledge, and skills), content, and duration of smoking cessation education in Latin American medical schools. The document discusses the following aspects: epidemiology, nicotine dependence, factors for initiation and maintenance of tobacco use, smoking-related disorders, diagnosis, minimal intervention, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation, and prevention of smoking.

Questions and Answers on Smoking in Patients With Diffuse ILD. Use of PICO Methodology. / Preguntas y respuestas relacionadas con tabaquismo en pacientes con EPID. Aplicación de metodología con formato PICO.

INTRODUCTION: The Smoking and the Diffuse Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) groups of ALAT and SEPAR collaborated in the preparation of this document. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This document uses PICO methodology to answer various questions on the relationship between tobacco use and diffuse ILD. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The main recommendations are: a) moderate level of evidence and strong recommendation to consider smoking as a risk factor for the development and/or modification of the progression of diffuse ILD; b) moderate level of evidence to identify an increase in mortality in diffuse ILD, irrespective of histologic pattern. Low evidence for ascribing it to smoking and strong recommendation for the early identification of patients with diffuse ILD. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of smoking cessation in patients with diffuse ILD; c) low level of evidence and weak recommendation for defining the impact of passive smoking in diffuse ILD; d) low level of evidence to demonstrate that smoking cessation improves the outcomes of patients diagnosed with diffuse ILD and strong recommendation to advise smoking cessation in smokers with diffuse ILD, and e) low level of evidence to support the clinical or epidemiological usefulness of active case finding for diffuse ILD in smoking cessation programs, and strong recommendation justifying the performance of spirometry in active case finding, based not on current smoking status, but on previous accumulated consumption, even in asymptomatic cases.

Prevención del Tabaquismo cumple 25 años. Su impacto en Argentina. Pasado, presente y futuro / Prevención del Tabaquismo has marked its 25th year. Its impact in Argentina. Past, present and future

No disponible

Debate 3: El fumador. ¿Nace o se hace?: se hace / Debate 3: The smoker. Are they born or made?: They are made

No disponible

Preguntas y respuestas relacionadas con tabaquismo en pacientes con EPOC. Aplicación de metodología con formato PICO / Using PICO Methodology to Answer Questions About Smoking in COPD Patients

Los grupos de control y tratamiento del tabaquismo de ALAT y SEPAR han colaborado para la realización de este documento en el que se da respuesta, siguiendo metodología PICO, a diferentes interrogantes relacionados con la asistencia sanitaria para ayudar a dejar de fumar a los pacientes con EPOC. Sus principales recomendaciones son: a)evidencia moderada y recomendación fuerte para realizar espirometría en pacientes con diagnóstico o en fumadores con alto riesgo de padecer EPOC, como instrumento de motivación, en particular evidenciando la edad pulmonar, y con fines diagnósticos y de búsqueda activa de casos; b)evidencia alta y recomendación fuerte para utilizar asesoramiento conductual intenso y específico y tratamiento farmacológico para ayudar a dejar de fumar a fumadores con EPOC; c)evidencia alta y recomendación fuerte para iniciar intervenciones para ayudar a dejar de fumar a fumadores con EPOC mientras se encuentran hospitalizados mejorando al mantener la intervención tras el alta, y d)evidencia alta y recomendación fuerte para la financiación del tratamiento del tabaquismo en fumadores con EPOC por su impacto sobre la salud y la economía de la salud (AU)

The ALAT and SEPAR Treatment and Control of Smoking Groups have collaborated in the preparation of this document which attempts to answer, by way of PICO methodology, different questions on health interventions for helping COPD patients to stop smoking. The main recommendations are: (I) moderate-quality evidence and strong recommendation for performing spirometry in COPD patients and in smokers with a high risk of developing the disease, as a motivational tool (particularly for showing evidence of lung age), a diagnostic tool, and for active case-finding; (II) high-quality evidence and strong recommendation for using intensive dedicated behavioral counselling and drug treatment for helping COPD patients to stop smoking; (III)high-quality evidence and strong recommendation for initiating interventions for helping COPD patients to stop smoking during hospitalization with improvement when the intervention is prolonged after discharge, and (IV) high-quality evidence and strong recommendation for funding treatment of smoking in COPD patients, in view of the impact on health and health economics (AU)

Patología pulmonar asociada al consumo de marihuana / Lung disease associated with marijuana use

La marihuana es la droga ilícita más consumida en el mundo con prevalencia de 2,5 a 5% y la segunda sustancia fumada después del tabaco. Los componentes del humo por la combustión de esta sustancia son similares a los producidos en la combustión del tabaco, pero difieren en la sustancia psicoactiva y en la práctica de fumar. La inhalación del humo de cannabis produce consecuencias sobre el aparato respiratorio. Por ello se hace necesario actualizar la evidencia disponible para ofrecer información científica al neumólogo. En este artículo se revisa el impacto del consumo de cannabis en los pulmones, teniendo en cuenta que la ruta más popular de la ingestión de cannabis es a través de las vías respiratorias (AU)

Marijuana is the most widely used illegal drug in the world, with a prevalence of 2.5%-5%, and the second most commonly smoked substance after tobacco. The components of smoke from combustion of marijuana are similar to those produced by the combustion of tobacco, but they differ in terms of psychoactive components and use. Inhalation of cannabis smoke affects the respiratory tract, so the available evidence must be updated in order to provide pulmonologists with the latest scientific information. In this article, we review the impact of cannabis consumption on the lungs, taking into account that the respiratory route is the most popular route of cannabis consumption (AU)

Using PICO Methodology to Answer Questions About Smoking in COPD Patients. / Preguntas y respuestas relacionadas con tabaquismo en pacientes con EPOC. Aplicación de metodología con formato PICO.

The ALAT and SEPAR Treatment and Control of Smoking Groups have collaborated in the preparation of this document which attempts to answer, by way of PICO methodology, different questions on health interventions for helping COPD patients to stop smoking. The main recommendations are: (i)moderate-quality evidence and strong recommendation for performing spirometry in COPD patients and in smokers with a high risk of developing the disease, as a motivational tool (particularly for showing evidence of lung age), a diagnostic tool, and for active case-finding; (ii)high-quality evidence and strong recommendation for using intensive dedicated behavioral counselling and drug treatment for helping COPD patients to stop smoking; (iii)high-quality evidence and strong recommendation for initiating interventions for helping COPD patients to stop smoking during hospitalization with improvement when the intervention is prolonged after discharge, and (iv)high-quality evidence and strong recommendation for funding treatment of smoking in COPD patients, in view of the impact on health and health economics.

Lung Disease Associated With Marijuana Use. / Patología pulmonar asociada al consumo de marihuana.

Marijuana is the most widely usedillegal drug in the world, with a prevalence of 2.5%-5%, and the second most commonly smoked substance after tobacco. The components of smoke from combustion of marijuana are similar to those produced by the combustion of tobacco, but they differ in terms of psychoactive components and use. Inhalation of cannabis smoke affects the respiratory tract, so the available evidence must be updated in order to provide pulmonologists with the latest scientific information. In this article, we review the impact of cannabis consumption on the lungs, taking into account that the respiratory route is the most popular route of cannabis consumption.

El control del tabaquismo en los países Ibero-latino-americanos. Parte 2 / The control of smoking habit in the Ibero-Latin American countries. Part 2

No disponible